Hi Alex,
On 7/6/23 11:25, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
Hi Gatien
On 7/5/23 19:27, Gatien Chevallier wrote:
RIFSC is a firewall controller. Change its compatible so that is matches
the documentation and reference RIFSC as a feature-domain-controller.
Signed-off-by: Gatien Chevallier <gatien.chevallier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/stm32mp251.dtsi | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/stm32mp251.dtsi
b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/stm32mp251.dtsi
index 5268a4321841..62101084cab8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/stm32mp251.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/stm32mp251.dtsi
@@ -106,17 +106,20 @@ soc@0 {
ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x80000000>;
rifsc: rifsc-bus@42080000 {
- compatible = "simple-bus";
+ compatible = "st,stm32mp25-rifsc";
You could keep "simple-bus" compatible (in second position). In case of
the RIFSC is not probed, the platform will be able to boot. If you agree
you can use the same for ETZPC.
Cheers
Alex
Sure, good point.
I'll change that in V2
Best regards,
Gatien
reg = <0x42080000 0x1000>;
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
ranges;
+ feature-domain-controller;
+ #feature-domain-cells = <1>;
usart2: serial@400e0000 {
compatible = "st,stm32h7-uart";
reg = <0x400e0000 0x400>;
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 115 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
clocks = <&ck_flexgen_08>;
+ feature-domains = <&rifsc 32>;
status = "disabled";
};
};
