On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 16:58:13 +0200 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 06:51:06PM +0100, Angel Iglesias wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I don't want to step anyone's work here, so I'm sending this RFC to the > > devs involved in the original discussion. I read on Uwe Kleine-König's > > patchset submission thread the necessity for an i2c helper to aid with the > > migration to the new i2c_driver .probe_new callback. Following the > > suggestions made there, I wrote this small patchset implementing the > > suggested helper function and ported the bmp280 IIO i2c probe to the new > > probe using that helper. > > For the entire series (please drop RFC in the next version) > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> I'm happy to pick up the next version but a question on 'route' in to the kernel. I can do an immutable branch with just the new function call in it if that is useful given I assume this is applicable across a bunch of subsystems? Jonathan > > > Thanks for your time! > > Angel > > > > Original discussion thread for additional context: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221023132302.911644-11-u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > Angel Iglesias (2): > > i2c: core: Introduce i2c_client_get_device_id helper function > > iio: pressure: bmp280: convert to i2c's .probe_new() > > > > drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ > > drivers/iio/pressure/bmp280-i2c.c | 8 ++++---- > > include/linux/i2c.h | 1 + > > 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > base-commit: c32793afc6976e170f6ab11ca3750fe94fb3454d > > -- > > 2.38.1 > > >
