This is no bugfix (so no Fixes: tag is necessary) as it is
taken care of in hid_sensor_custom_add_attributes().
The motivation for this patch is that:
hid_sensor_custom_field.attr_name and
hid_sensor_custom_field.attrs
has the size of HID_CUSTOM_TOTAL_ATTRS and used in same context.
We compare against HID_CUSTOM_TOTAL_ATTRS when
looping through hid_custom_attrs.
We will silent the smatch error:
hid_sensor_custom_add_attributes() error: buffer overflow
'hid_custom_attrs' 8 <= 10
Signed-off-by: Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c
index 32c2306e240d..602465ad2745 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ struct hid_sensor_sample {
u32 raw_len;
} __packed;
-static struct attribute hid_custom_attrs[] = {
+static struct attribute hid_custom_attrs[HID_CUSTOM_TOTAL_ATTRS] = {
{.name = "name", .mode = S_IRUGO},
{.name = "units", .mode = S_IRUGO},
{.name = "unit-expo", .mode = S_IRUGO},
--
2.37.1
