On Thu, 8 Sep 2022 17:49:24 +0300 Ibrahim Tilki <Ibrahim.Tilki@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Adding documentation for Analog Devices max11410 adc userspace sysfs. > > Signed-off-by: Ibrahim Tilki <Ibrahim.Tilki@xxxxxxxxxx> I debated a bit with myself when reviewing the driver this time on whether we wanted filter_notchY_en or as you have it filterY_notch_en It's a bit similar to channel naming in which we potentially allow in_accel0_x_raw in_accel1_x_raw in_accel0_y_raw or in_accel0_x_raw in_accel1_x_raw in_accel2_y_raw etc depending on whether the index is considered global across all modifiers or not. We decided long ago that either was fine as they are uniquely identifiable either by channel index, or by index + modifier. Anyhow, upshot is I'm fine with the ordering you have here - but if anyone else has time to take a look and comment on why one option is better than the other that would be great. Thanks, Jonathan > --- > .../ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio-adc-max11410 | 13 +++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio-adc-max11410 > > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio-adc-max11410 b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio-adc-max11410 > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000..2a53c6b37 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio-adc-max11410 > @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ > +What: /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_voltage_filterY_notch_en > +Date: September 2022 > +KernelVersion: 6.0 > +Contact: linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > +Description: > + Enable or disable a notch filter. > + > +What: /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_voltage_filterY_notch_center > +Date: September 2022 > +KernelVersion: 6.0 > +Contact: linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > +Description: > + Center frequency of the notch filter in Hz.
