RE: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: adc: Document Renesas RZ/G2UL ADC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Geert,

Thanks for the feedback.

> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: adc: Document Renesas RZ/G2UL
> ADC
> 
> Hi Biju,
> 
> On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 9:04 AM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > Document Renesas RZ/G2UL ADC bindings. RZ/G2UL ADC is almost identical
> > to RZ/G2L, but it has 2 analog input channels compared to 8 channels
> > on the RZ/G2L.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > v2->v3:
> >  * Added generic description for reg.
> >  * Improved schema validation by restricting both channel and reg to [0-
> 1].
> 
> Thanks for the update!
> 
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/renesas,rzg2l-adc.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/renesas,rzg2l-adc.yaml
> > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ properties:
> >    compatible:
> >      items:
> >        - enum:
> > +          - renesas,r9a07g043-adc   # RZ/G2UL
> >            - renesas,r9a07g044-adc   # RZ/G2L
> >            - renesas,r9a07g054-adc   # RZ/V2L
> >        - const: renesas,rzg2l-adc
> > @@ -76,16 +77,43 @@ patternProperties:
> >      properties:
> >        reg:
> >          description: |
> > -          The channel number. It can have up to 8 channels numbered from
> 0 to 7.
> > -        items:
> > -          - minimum: 0
> > -            maximum: 7
> > +          The channel number.
> >
> >      required:
> >        - reg
> >
> >      additionalProperties: false
> >
> > +allOf:
> > +  - if:
> > +      properties:
> > +        compatible:
> > +          contains:
> > +            const: renesas,r9a07g043-adc
> > +    then:
> > +      patternProperties:
> > +        "^channel@[2-7]$": false
> > +        "^channel@[0-1]$":
> > +          type: object
> > +          properties:
> > +            reg:
> > +              description: |
> > +                It can have up to 2 channels numbered from 0 to 1.
> 
> IMHO the description doesn't add any value, as it's equivalent to the logic
> below.

It is suggested by Jonathan on my previous version. If there is no objection,
I can drop this.

> 
> > +              items:
> 
> I don't think the "items" is needed or wanted, as there can be only one?

It will be 2 right? eg:- reg = <0> and reg = <1>;

Without this reg index validation fails.

Cheers,
Biju

> 
> > +                - minimum: 0
> > +                  maximum: 1
> 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                         Geert
> 
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-
> m68k.org
> 
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker.
> But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something
> like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux