Hi Jonathan, jic23@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on Sun, 10 Apr 2022 16:27:41 +0100: > On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 10:02:00 +0200 > Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi Jonathan, > > > > miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on Tue, 15 Mar 2022 16:44:50 +0100: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > + Christophe > > > > > > jic23@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on Sun, 27 Feb 2022 13:35:49 +0000: > > > > > > > On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:53:08 +0100 > > > > Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Jonathan, > > > > > > > > > > jic23@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on Sun, 13 Feb 2022 18:42:24 +0000: > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 7 Feb 2022 15:38:40 +0100 > > > > > > Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > As part of a previous discussion with Jonathan Cameron [1], it appeared > > > > > > > necessary to clarify the meaning of each mode so that new developers > > > > > > > could understand better what they should use or not use and when. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The idea of renaming these modes as been let aside because naming is a > > > > > > > big deal and requires a lot of thinking. So for now let's focus on > > > > > > > correctly explaining what each mode implies. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20210930165510.2295e6c4@jic23-huawei/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Suggested-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > One trivial thing inline as a result of edits in v3. > > > > > > > > > > > > Otherwise, I want to let this series sit a little longer and ideally get > > > > > > some eyes on the st_sensors patches. > > > > Sometimes there is no other choice than applying patches to get > > feedback :) Hopefully nothing unexpected will happen, but as this > > series lived almost two month on the mailing list already, I would > > propose to merge the series as it is. We can still drop/revert it as we > > are rather soon in the new cycle. If rebasing is needed just let me > > know. > > Fully agree on pushing forwards with merging this. I've done the rebase whilst > applying. Other than a bit of fuzz main change was that adxl367 made use > of a kfifo buffer in the meantime so needed updating as well to drop the > buffer type parameter. Great! > Take a quick look and see if I messed anything up. > Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing for 0-day > etc to take a poke at it before I make a mess of linux-next. Yep, found on the testing branch, everything LGTM but TBH I don't fully remember everything as it was "some" time ago :) Thanks, Miquèl
