Hi Jonathan, miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on Tue, 15 Mar 2022 16:44:50 +0100: > Hello, > > + Christophe > > jic23@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on Sun, 27 Feb 2022 13:35:49 +0000: > > > On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:53:08 +0100 > > Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Hi Jonathan, > > > > > > jic23@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on Sun, 13 Feb 2022 18:42:24 +0000: > > > > > > > On Mon, 7 Feb 2022 15:38:40 +0100 > > > > Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > As part of a previous discussion with Jonathan Cameron [1], it appeared > > > > > necessary to clarify the meaning of each mode so that new developers > > > > > could understand better what they should use or not use and when. > > > > > > > > > > The idea of renaming these modes as been let aside because naming is a > > > > > big deal and requires a lot of thinking. So for now let's focus on > > > > > correctly explaining what each mode implies. > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20210930165510.2295e6c4@jic23-huawei/ > > > > > > > > > > Suggested-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > One trivial thing inline as a result of edits in v3. > > > > > > > > Otherwise, I want to let this series sit a little longer and ideally get > > > > some eyes on the st_sensors patches. Sometimes there is no other choice than applying patches to get feedback :) Hopefully nothing unexpected will happen, but as this series lived almost two month on the mailing list already, I would propose to merge the series as it is. We can still drop/revert it as we are rather soon in the new cycle. If rebasing is needed just let me know. Cheers, Miquèl > > > > > > Sure. > > > > Denis, Linus, Lorenzo, > > > > If any of you have time to take a look at patches 4-8 in this series or ideally > > to run basic sanity tests with series in place that would be great. > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-iio/list/?series=611853 > > > > I don't have a convenient platform to test that driver on any more and the > > changes are invasive enough to make me a little nervous about taking the > > series without someone more familiar with that driver taking a look. > > I'm adding Christophe from ST who might also help having these patches > tested or at least reviewed. > > TLDR: as part of a wider cleanup, I ended up "playing" with locks in > the st_sensors drivers, so any testing or feedback is welcome! > > Thanks, > Miquèl
