On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 4:38 PM Kai-Heng Feng
<kai.heng.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> x86 boards may use ACPI HID "IFX3100" for dps310 device.
the dps310
> Vendor told us feel free to add the ID and contact
> "Saumitra.Chafekar@xxxxxxxxxxxx" for any further question.
questions
> So add an ACPI match table for that accordingly.
I have checked the official PNP registry and may confirm IFX is for
Infineon, since they are aware
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for all your efforts, appreciate it!
> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2:
> - Drop ACPI_PTR().
> - Add info from vendor.
>
> drivers/iio/pressure/dps310.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/pressure/dps310.c b/drivers/iio/pressure/dps310.c
> index 0730380ceb692..7e6fcb32212a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/pressure/dps310.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/pressure/dps310.c
> @@ -812,9 +812,17 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id dps310_id[] = {
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, dps310_id);
>
> +static const struct acpi_device_id dps310_acpi_match[] = {
> + { "IFX3100" },
> + { },
> +};
> +
This is redundant, I hope Jonathan may remove it when applying.
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, dps310_acpi_match);
> +
> static struct i2c_driver dps310_driver = {
> .driver = {
> .name = DPS310_DEV_NAME,
> + .acpi_match_table = dps310_acpi_match,
> },
> .probe = dps310_probe,
> .id_table = dps310_id,
> --
> 2.33.1
>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
