On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 11:08 AM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 20:15:57 +0200 > Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 7:23 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 13:25:04 -0800 > > > Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > ... > > > > > > Fixes: f75095753 ("iio:proximity:sx9360: Add sx9360 support") > > > This is part of the tag block so should appear. Done: The patch is at https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220122213444.745152-1-gwendal@xxxxxxxxxxxx/. Given the title change, it is not automatically connected to this patch. I should have added a --in-reply-to argument to my git send-mail command, will do better next time. Gwendal. > > > > > > > fixes tag should be here. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jongpil Jung <jongpil19.jung@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > ...and the submitter's SoB must be last (according to the documentation). > > > Hi Andy, > > If it's a handling chain, rather that about co development etc then > I'd expect it to be in this order to indicate that Gwendal was on the > route to upstream. > > "Any further SoBs (Signed-off-by:'s) following the author's SoB are from > people handling and transporting the patch, but were not involved in its > development. SoB chains should reflect the **real** route a patch took > as it was propagated to the maintainers and ultimately to Linus, with > the first SoB entry signalling primary authorship of a single author." > > Jonathan