Re: [PATCH v3] iio: light: ltr501: Added ltr303 driver support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 16:20:35 +0200
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 3:57 PM Dmitry Maslov <maslovdmitry@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > From: "Andy Shevchenko" <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent Time: 2021-10-31 22:07:09 (Sunday)
> > > On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 6:46 PM Maslov Dmitry <maslovdmitry@xxxxxxxx> wrote:  
> 
> ...
> 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Maslov Dmitry <maslovdmitry@xxxxxxxx>  
> > >
> > > I believe it should be Dmitry Maslov, i.e. First name Last name.  
> >
> > I could change that, but I do not think there is an international standard for that. The reason I put Maslov Dmitry
> > is to be in line with corporate email address, which belongs to a Chinese company - in China surname is put first
> > on the legal documents.  
> 
> Hmm... You are right, there is no such requirement in the Submitting
> Patches document.

Curiously we (Huawei) got push back on using conventional Chinese name
ordering, so now submit everything with names swapped. I can't remember
exactly which maintainer was determined we should do that... After some
internal discussions we decided it was easier to just swap people's names
than to argue about it.  No one expressed any particularly
strong opinions about the decision but perhaps people were just being polite.

E.g. A random patch with sign-off from leizhen and xuwei.

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=b2bbc8687e43df456a6d194bc2c3ab9431b770cb

Still I don't care or consider it a problem so accept whatever people
prefer as long as it's in some sense their legal name for purposes of
DCO.

Jonathan


> ...
> 
> > > > @@ -1597,6 +1610,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id ltr_acpi_match[] = {
> > > >         {"LTER0501", ltr501},
> > > >         {"LTER0559", ltr559},
> > > >         {"LTER0301", ltr301},
> > > > +       {"LTER0303", ltr303},  
> > >
> > > Any evidence of this ACPI ID being in the wild, please?  
> >
> > I'm sorry, I do not exactly understand the question. Do you mean where that particular sensor is used?  
> 
> Can you provide a name of the machine which has this ID in its DSDT
> table, please?
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux