I also suspect a mistake from the hardware vendors. I attached all DSDT decompiled, which shows that they indeed use that ID, and I also attached the windows driver .INF which was published on their website with the driver (https://www.ayaneo.com/downloads) They are a small startup so they might have used the realtek ID by mistake. I added them to the CC. BTW, I also notice a rotation matrix embedded in DSTD, but the linux's BMI160 driver doesn't recognize it. Best regards, Maxim Levitsky On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 6:31 PM Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > +Cc: Realtek people whom I found in MAINTAINERS or so. Please > waterfall to the people inside Realtek who can answer the question. > (Note, you may access this discussion in full via: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/CACAwPwYQHRcrabw9=0tvenPzAcwwW1pTaR6a+AEWBF9Hqf_wXQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u) > > The problem here is to have an official confirmation of what 10ec:5280 > ID is from Realtek's point of view. Context: the current discussion > and a patch state that it's related to gyro sensor. Is it so? > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 6:36 AM Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 7:19 PM Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > I recently bought this device, and it has this accelerometer/gyroscope. > > > > > > Unfortunately, the device is advertised in ACPI as 10EC5280, instead of BMI0160 > > > > > > I attached a patch that does add this 10EC5280 to the list of ACPI ids of this driver, and the device seems to work fine, showing both acceleration and angular velocity in /sys IIO attributes with reasonable values. > > > > > > > ( resend using plain text - reminds me to never use Gmail's web > > interface, even on weekends .) > > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko
Attachment:
BMI160.inf
Description: Binary data
<<attachment: DSDT.zip>>
