On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:15:23 +0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Em Sun, 16 May 2021 17:20:58 +0100 > Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > > > From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Remove an unblanced pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend() call > > in inv_pu_pm_disable(). Not this call is not a bug, because the runtime > > pm core will not allow the reference counter to go negative. It is > > however confusing and serves no purpose. > > > > pm_runtime_resume_and_get() case found using coccicheck script under > > review at: > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210427141946.2478411-1-Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxxx/ > > > > pm_runtime_resume_and_get() returns <= 0 only so simplify related checks > > to bring this more inline with nearby calls. > > > > This is a prequel to taking a closer look at the runtime pm in IIO drivers > > in general. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jmaneyrol@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > LGTM. > > Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks! Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing for 0-day to see if it can find anything we missed. Jonathan > > > > --- > > drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c | 19 ++++++------------- > > drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_trigger.c | 6 ++---- > > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c > > index 6244a07048df..4cae3765e327 100644 > > --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c > > +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c > > @@ -570,11 +570,9 @@ static int inv_mpu6050_read_channel_data(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, > > freq_hz = INV_MPU6050_DIVIDER_TO_FIFO_RATE(st->chip_config.divider); > > period_us = 1000000 / freq_hz; > > > > - result = pm_runtime_get_sync(pdev); > > - if (result < 0) { > > - pm_runtime_put_noidle(pdev); > > + result = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(pdev); > > + if (result) > > return result; > > - } > > > > switch (chan->type) { > > case IIO_ANGL_VEL: > > @@ -812,11 +810,9 @@ static int inv_mpu6050_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, > > return result; > > > > mutex_lock(&st->lock); > > - result = pm_runtime_get_sync(pdev); > > - if (result < 0) { > > - pm_runtime_put_noidle(pdev); > > + result = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(pdev); > > + if (result) > > goto error_write_raw_unlock; > > - } > > > > switch (mask) { > > case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE: > > @@ -930,11 +926,9 @@ inv_mpu6050_fifo_rate_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, > > result = 0; > > goto fifo_rate_fail_unlock; > > } > > - result = pm_runtime_get_sync(pdev); > > - if (result < 0) { > > - pm_runtime_put_noidle(pdev); > > + result = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(pdev); > > + if (result) > > goto fifo_rate_fail_unlock; > > - } > > > > result = regmap_write(st->map, st->reg->sample_rate_div, d); > > if (result) > > @@ -1422,7 +1416,6 @@ static void inv_mpu_pm_disable(void *data) > > { > > struct device *dev = data; > > > > - pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend(dev); > > pm_runtime_disable(dev); > > } > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_trigger.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_trigger.c > > index e21ba778595a..2d0e8cdd4848 100644 > > --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_trigger.c > > +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_trigger.c > > @@ -173,11 +173,9 @@ static int inv_mpu6050_set_enable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, bool enable) > > > > if (enable) { > > scan = inv_scan_query(indio_dev); > > - result = pm_runtime_get_sync(pdev); > > - if (result < 0) { > > - pm_runtime_put_noidle(pdev); > > + result = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(pdev); > > + if (result) > > return result; > > - } > > /* > > * In case autosuspend didn't trigger, turn off first not > > * required sensors. > > > > Thanks, > Mauro
