On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 19:39:11 +0100 Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On 2/12/21 7:33 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Sun, 7 Feb 2021 17:08:58 +0100 > > Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Hi All, > >> > >> Here is a patch-set implementing the standardized "accel-display" > >> and "accel-base" label sysfs-attributes defined in my earlier > >> "[PATCH 1/2] iio: documentation: Document proximity sensor label use" > >> "[PATCH 2/2] iio: documentation: Document accelerometer label use" > >> series. > >> > >> This patch sets adds these labels to the bmc150 and kxcjk-1013 accel > >> drivers. > > Series applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing > > for the autobuilders to poke at it. > > Thanks, much appreciated. > > But this was sorta a follow-up to: > > [PATCH 1/2] iio: documentation: Document proximity sensor label use > [PATCH 2/2] iio: documentation: Document accelerometer label use > > Where 2/2 defines the standardized label values which this series uses > and AFAIK those have not been merged yet? > > I guess we can always fix the labels if discussion surrounding those > leads to standardizing on different label contents for this. But if > the discussion surrounding those results in the conclusion to not > use labels for this at all, while we already have this merged, then > we probably need to revert 2/3 and 3/3 of this series... > > But maybe I just missed the 2 documentation patches getting merged ? Understood. The changes for the docs patch that I was looking for are just editorial, so I wasn't that fussed if it goes in slightly out of order. Jonathan > > > Note we are almost certainly too late for coming merge window so this > > will be next time around. > > That is fine. > > Regards, > > Hans >
