Hi, On 2/12/21 7:33 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Sun, 7 Feb 2021 17:08:58 +0100 > Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Here is a patch-set implementing the standardized "accel-display" >> and "accel-base" label sysfs-attributes defined in my earlier >> "[PATCH 1/2] iio: documentation: Document proximity sensor label use" >> "[PATCH 2/2] iio: documentation: Document accelerometer label use" >> series. >> >> This patch sets adds these labels to the bmc150 and kxcjk-1013 accel >> drivers. > Series applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing > for the autobuilders to poke at it. Thanks, much appreciated. But this was sorta a follow-up to: [PATCH 1/2] iio: documentation: Document proximity sensor label use [PATCH 2/2] iio: documentation: Document accelerometer label use Where 2/2 defines the standardized label values which this series uses and AFAIK those have not been merged yet? I guess we can always fix the labels if discussion surrounding those leads to standardizing on different label contents for this. But if the discussion surrounding those results in the conclusion to not use labels for this at all, while we already have this merged, then we probably need to revert 2/3 and 3/3 of this series... But maybe I just missed the 2 documentation patches getting merged ? > Note we are almost certainly too late for coming merge window so this > will be next time around. That is fine. Regards, Hans
