Re: [PATCH] Correct bit mask for ADC result according to ADC's resolution.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 06:17:46PM +0100, Wilfried Wessner wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 5:11 PM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 04:54:30PM +0100, Wilfried Wessner wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Wilfried Wessner <wilfried.wessner@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > I know I can't take patches without any changelog text :(
> >
> Sorry, it's my first submitted patch, but what exactly do you mean by
> "changelog text"?

As my patch bot will say:

- You did not specify a description of why the patch is needed, or
  possibly, any description at all, in the email body.  Please read the
  section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file,
  Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what is needed in order to
  properly describe the change.

- You did not write a descriptive Subject: for the patch, allowing Greg,
  and everyone else, to know what this patch is all about.  Please read
  the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file,
  Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what a proper Subject: line should
  look like.

Read that file and then resend (with the proper version information) and
all should be good!

thanks,

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux