Re: [PATCH] Correct bit mask for ADC result according to ADC's resolution.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] Correct bit mask for ADC result according to ADC's resolution.
From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 17:11:43 +0100
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20210204155430.GA557111@ubuntu>
References: <20210204155430.GA557111@ubuntu>

On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 04:54:30PM +0100, Wilfried Wessner wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Wilfried Wessner <wilfried.wessner@xxxxxxxxx>

I know I can't take patches without any changelog text :(

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Correct bit mask for ADC result according to ADC's resolution.
  - From: Wilfried Wessner

References:
- [PATCH] Correct bit mask for ADC result according to ADC's resolution.
  - From: Wilfried Wessner

Prev by Date: [PATCH] Correct bit mask for ADC result according to ADC's resolution.
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] docs: ioctl-number.rst: reserve IIO subsystem ioctl() space
Previous by thread: [PATCH] Correct bit mask for ADC result according to ADC's resolution.
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Correct bit mask for ADC result according to ADC's resolution.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Input] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [X.org]

Powered by Linux