On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 21:32:03 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 8:16 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > There is no real advantage in having these protections and
> > for parts that do not have an explicit ACPI ID, it prevents the
> > use of PRP0001. I'm trying to clear this out of IIO in general
> > to avoid copying in new drivers.
> >
> > Include mod_devicetable.h as we are using of_device_id in here so
> > including that header is best practice.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
Applied,
Thanks,
Jonathan
>
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Angelo Compagnucci <angelo.compagnucci@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > v1->v2
> > * Mention that some parts of valid IDs, so we are interesting in
> > enabling PRP0001 option for those that don't.
> >
> > drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
> > index e86f55ce093f..3143f35a6509 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
> > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> > #include <linux/err.h>
> > #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> > #include <linux/iio/iio.h>
> > #include <linux/property.h>
> > #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> > @@ -220,7 +221,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, adc128_acpi_match);
> > static struct spi_driver adc128_driver = {
> > .driver = {
> > .name = "adc128s052",
> > - .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(adc128_of_match),
> > + .of_match_table = adc128_of_match,
> > .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(adc128_acpi_match),
> > },
> > .probe = adc128_probe,
> > --
> > 2.27.0
> >
>
>
