On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 8:16 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> There is no real advantage in having these protections and
> for parts that do not have an explicit ACPI ID, it prevents the
> use of PRP0001. I'm trying to clear this out of IIO in general
> to avoid copying in new drivers.
>
> Include mod_devicetable.h as we are using of_device_id in here so
> including that header is best practice.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Angelo Compagnucci <angelo.compagnucci@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v1->v2
> * Mention that some parts of valid IDs, so we are interesting in
> enabling PRP0001 option for those that don't.
>
> drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
> index e86f55ce093f..3143f35a6509 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> #include <linux/iio/iio.h>
> #include <linux/property.h>
> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> @@ -220,7 +221,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, adc128_acpi_match);
> static struct spi_driver adc128_driver = {
> .driver = {
> .name = "adc128s052",
> - .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(adc128_of_match),
> + .of_match_table = adc128_of_match,
> .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(adc128_acpi_match),
> },
> .probe = adc128_probe,
> --
> 2.27.0
>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
