On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 7:18 AM Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The following warnings are seen with 'make dt_binding_check': > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/dac/adi,ad5770r.example.dts:29.35-32.27: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-0/spi/ad5770r@0/channel@0: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/dac/adi,ad5770r.example.dts:34.35-37.27: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-0/spi/ad5770r@0/channel@1: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/dac/adi,ad5770r.example.dts:39.35-42.27: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-0/spi/ad5770r@0/channel@2: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/dac/adi,ad5770r.example.dts:44.35-47.27: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-0/spi/ad5770r@0/channel@3: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/dac/adi,ad5770r.example.dts:49.35-52.27: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-0/spi/ad5770r@0/channel@4: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/dac/adi,ad5770r.example.dts:54.35-57.27: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-0/spi/ad5770r@0/channel@5: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property > > Fix them by removing the unneeded unit addresses. Actually, we want to use 'reg' instead of 'num'. Alexandru is attempting to fix[1]. But looks like you found another issue with patch 1. Rob [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/CAL_JsqKFdcACQtXd5h=4Pxbij+=uoHr2rLTFZMq4fVX8ph398g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
