On Sun, Mar 01, 2020 at 02:34:18PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:50:15 +0530 > Rohit Sarkar <rohitsarkar5398@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 09:41:37PM +0530, Rohit Sarkar wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I am proposing to work on the accelerometer MPU6050 as my primary > > > project for the summer. The work items are outlined in [1] thanks to > > > Jean. > > > If time permits (which it should), I will be picking up other tasks > > > outlined in [2] by Jonathan and Alexandru. > > > > > > > > > Would like to hear people's views on this. > > > > > > [1]: https://marc.info/?l=linux-iio&m=158257639113000&w=2 > > > [2]: https://marc.info/?l=linux-iio&m=158261515624212&w=2 > > > Thanks, > > > Rohit > > > > > > > Hey guys, > > would love some feedback on this. > > There are no proposals as such on the GSOC IIO page [1]. > > Was wondering if there is any new iio driver that can be made into a > > gsoc project. > > Hi Rohit, > > A couple of questions. Do you have a gsoc mentor lined up? On the GSOC IIO page (https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/gsoc/2020-gsoc-iio-driver) Dragos has been listed as a mentor. Haven't really heard back from him yet. > You should discuss a proposal with whoever that is. > > My gut feeling is that the features suggested by Jean-Baptisite > do not form a particularly good focus for the body of a gsoc project. > There are too many rather disassociated items, without a connected > 'story'. > > They are good items for getting familiar with the subsystem and > a particular driver but for the actual project you probably want > something that is more 'yours' in the sense that you drive it from > initial prototypes through to final upstream code. > > Previous projects have (I think) mostly centred on support for a new > driver. Makes sense. Is there any new driver that needs to be added though? And if not what else can qualify as a project? > Thanks, > > Jonathan > > Thanks, Rohit
