On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 08:19:08 -0600 Dylan Howey <Dylan.Howey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 02/14/2020 13:24, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > So ideally we'd get someone at Freescale to confirm there is a hardware > > rather than a documentation issue (i.e. maybe we need some other magic). > I'll try that route first. I have an NXP contact. > > > If they do we probably need to avoid breaking them so would need a module > > parameter to be 'enable temp' rather than the more natural option > > of 'disable temp' to be set only by people who need the highest > > frequency. > That's what I had in mind. > > > The question is whether anyone actually cares about 800Hz? > I have a use case for this. I'm doing some data logging with this hardware > and a higher sample rate is always better. > > By the way, this hardware has a fifo that the driver isn't using. I might > add support for that. Currently I'm trying to log and getting hammered with > an 800Hz interrupt and that is causing some issues. Yeah. Those sorts of rates tend to get tricky without using hardware fifos. Great if you can add support. Thanks, Jonathan >
