On 02/14/2020 13:24, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > So ideally we'd get someone at Freescale to confirm there is a hardware > rather than a documentation issue (i.e. maybe we need some other magic). I'll try that route first. I have an NXP contact. > If they do we probably need to avoid breaking them so would need a module > parameter to be 'enable temp' rather than the more natural option > of 'disable temp' to be set only by people who need the highest > frequency. That's what I had in mind. > The question is whether anyone actually cares about 800Hz? I have a use case for this. I'm doing some data logging with this hardware and a higher sample rate is always better. By the way, this hardware has a fifo that the driver isn't using. I might add support for that. Currently I'm trying to log and getting hammered with an 800Hz interrupt and that is causing some issues. -- Dylan
