On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 07:46:04 +0000
"Ardelean, Alexandru" <alexandru.Ardelean@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 12:08 -0300, Daniel Junho wrote:
> > [External]
> >
> > The ad7928 is software compatible with the ad7923.
> > The ad7908 and ad7918 are the 8 and 10-bit versions of the ad7928.
> >
>
> The patch looks good.
> Comments mostly about namimg.
> One about channel numbers.
>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Junho <djunho@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/adc/ad7923.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7923.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7923.c
> > index 6d56fa0b9e30..ae807fcaad76 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7923.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7923.c
> > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> > // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > /*
> > - * AD7904/AD7914/AD7923/AD7924 SPI ADC driver
> > + * AD7904/AD7914/AD7923/AD7924/AD7908/AD7918/AD7928 SPI ADC driver
> > *
> > * Copyright 2011 Analog Devices Inc (from AD7923 Driver)
> > * Copyright 2012 CS Systemes d'Information
> > @@ -29,11 +29,14 @@
> > #define AD7923_PM_MODE_AS (1) /* auto shutdown */
> > #define AD7923_PM_MODE_FS (2) /* full shutdown */
> > #define AD7923_PM_MODE_OPS (3) /* normal operation */
> > -#define AD7923_SEQUENCE_OFF (0) /* no sequence fonction
> > */
> > -#define AD7923_SEQUENCE_PROTECT (2) /* no interrupt
> > write cycle */
> > -#define AD7923_SEQUENCE_ON (3) /* continuous sequence */
> >
> > -#define AD7923_MAX_CHAN 4
> > +#define AD7923_SEQUENCE_OFF (0x00) /* no sequence function
> > */
> > +#define AD7923_SEQUENCE_SHADOW (0x01) /* use the shadow
> > register
> > + * for programming
> > + * (only AD7908/7918/7928)
>
>
> [1] Since this reg is only available on these 3 chips, you could rename
> this to AD7908_SEQUENCE_SHADOW and use it for these 3 chips only.
> That way, you don't need to mention via comment "(only AD7908/7918/7928)"
>
>
> > + */
> > +#define AD7923_SEQUENCE_PROTECT (0x10) /* no interrupt
> > write cycle */
> > +#define AD7923_SEQUENCE_ON (0x11) /* continuous sequence */
> >
> > #define AD7923_PM_MODE_WRITE(mode) ((mode) << 4) /* write mode */
> > #define AD7923_CHANNEL_WRITE(channel) ((channel) << 6) /* write
> > channel */
> > @@ -74,6 +77,9 @@ enum ad7923_id {
> > AD7904,
> > AD7914,
> > AD7924,
> > + AD7908,
> > + AD7918,
> > + AD7928
> > };
> >
> > #define AD7923_V_CHAN(index, bits) \
> > @@ -93,7 +99,7 @@ enum ad7923_id {
> > }, \
> > }
> >
> > -#define DECLARE_AD7923_CHANNELS(name, bits) \
> > +#define DECLARE_AD7923_4CHANNELS(name, bits) \
> > const struct iio_chan_spec name ## _channels[] = { \
> > AD7923_V_CHAN(0, bits), \
> > AD7923_V_CHAN(1, bits), \
> > @@ -102,9 +108,25 @@ const struct iio_chan_spec name ## _channels[] = { \
> > IIO_CHAN_SOFT_TIMESTAMP(4), \
> > }
> >
> > -static DECLARE_AD7923_CHANNELS(ad7904, 8);
> > -static DECLARE_AD7923_CHANNELS(ad7914, 10);
> > -static DECLARE_AD7923_CHANNELS(ad7924, 12);
> > +#define DECLARE_AD7923_8CHANNELS(name, bits) \
>
> Same comments as [1], you could leave DECLARE_AD7923_CHANNELS and declare
> DECLARE_AD7908_CHANNELS which has 8 channels and use for the 3 new chips.
>
> > +const struct iio_chan_spec name ## _channels[] = { \
> > + AD7923_V_CHAN(0, bits), \
> > + AD7923_V_CHAN(1, bits), \
> > + AD7923_V_CHAN(2, bits), \
> > + AD7923_V_CHAN(3, bits), \
> > + AD7923_V_CHAN(4, bits), \
> > + AD7923_V_CHAN(5, bits), \
> > + AD7923_V_CHAN(6, bits), \
> > + AD7923_V_CHAN(7, bits), \
> > + IIO_CHAN_SOFT_TIMESTAMP(8), \
> > +}
> > +
> > +static DECLARE_AD7923_4CHANNELS(ad7904, 8);
> > +static DECLARE_AD7923_4CHANNELS(ad7914, 10);
> > +static DECLARE_AD7923_4CHANNELS(ad7924, 12);
> > +static DECLARE_AD7923_8CHANNELS(ad7908, 8);
> > +static DECLARE_AD7923_8CHANNELS(ad7918, 10);
> > +static DECLARE_AD7923_8CHANNELS(ad7928, 12);
> >
> > static const struct ad7923_chip_info ad7923_chip_info[] = {
> > [AD7904] = {
> > @@ -119,6 +141,18 @@ static const struct ad7923_chip_info
> > ad7923_chip_info[] = {
> > .channels = ad7924_channels,
> > .num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(ad7924_channels),
> > },
> > + [AD7908] = {
> > + .channels = ad7908_channels,
> > + .num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(ad7908_channels),
> > + },
> > + [AD7918] = {
> > + .channels = ad7918_channels,
> > + .num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(ad7918_channels),
> > + },
> > + [AD7928] = {
> > + .channels = ad7928_channels,
> > + .num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(ad7928_channels),
> > + },
> > };
> >
> > /**
> > @@ -131,7 +165,7 @@ static int ad7923_update_scan_mode(struct iio_dev
> > *indio_dev,
> > int i, cmd, len;
> >
> > len = 0;
> > - for_each_set_bit(i, active_scan_mask, AD7923_MAX_CHAN) {
> > + for_each_set_bit(i, active_scan_mask, indio_dev->num_channels - 1)
>
> I got the idea about 'indio_dev->num_channel - 1'.
> This makes the assumption that the number of IIO channels is always HW-
> channels + 1 timestamp channel [which for now is true].
> I'm not sure if this is ok.
>
> I think Jonathan would be a bit better here to comment.
It is a driver specific assumption so we don't need it to be true
in general. Perhaps add a comment along the lines of
/*
* For this driver the last channel is always the software timestamp so
* skip that one.
*/
>
> > {
> > cmd = AD7923_WRITE_CR | AD7923_CHANNEL_WRITE(i) |
> > AD7923_SEQUENCE_WRITE(AD7923_SEQUENCE_OFF) |
> > st->settings;
> > @@ -344,6 +378,9 @@ static const struct spi_device_id ad7923_id[] = {
> > {"ad7914", AD7914},
> > {"ad7923", AD7924},
> > {"ad7924", AD7924},
> > + {"ad7908", AD7908},
> > + {"ad7918", AD7918},
> > + {"ad7928", AD7928},
> > {}
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, ad7923_id);
> > @@ -353,6 +390,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id ad7923_of_match[] =
> > {
> > { .compatible = "adi,ad7914", },
> > { .compatible = "adi,ad7923", },
> > { .compatible = "adi,ad7924", },
> > + { .compatible = "adi,ad7908", },
> > + { .compatible = "adi,ad7918", },
> > + { .compatible = "adi,ad7928", },
> > { },
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ad7923_of_match);
> > @@ -370,5 +410,5 @@ module_spi_driver(ad7923_driver);
> >
> > MODULE_AUTHOR("Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@xxxxxxxxxx>");
> > MODULE_AUTHOR("Patrick Vasseur <patrick.vasseur@xxxxxx>");
> > -MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Analog Devices AD7904/AD7914/AD7923/AD7924 ADC");
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Analog Devices
> > AD7904/AD7914/AD7923/AD7924/AD7908/AD7918/AD7928 ADC");
>
> This description is becoming long.
> Maybe simplify to
> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Analog Devices AD7923 and similar ADC");
>
> > MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
