On 10/11/19 13:17, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 14:26:40 -0800
> Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Add a layer of sanity checking to cros_ec_register against attempting to
>> register IRQ values that are not strictly greater than 0.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Enrico Granata <egranata@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This strikes me as something that could be a potential fix to backport?
> Any known cases of a negative irq getting to here or is this a by
> inspection thing?
>
> Otherwise seems obviously correct.
> Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
Looks good to me:
Acked-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Enric
> Jonathan
>
>> ---
>> No changes in v4, v3.
>> Changes in v2:
>> Remove dual Enrico's signature.
>>
>> drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec.c
>> index 925f84dbf621..d3dfa27171e6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec.c
>> @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ int cros_ec_register(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev)
>> return err;
>> }
>>
>> - if (ec_dev->irq) {
>> + if (ec_dev->irq > 0) {
>> err = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, ec_dev->irq,
>> ec_irq_handler,
>> ec_irq_thread,
>
