On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 14:26:40 -0800
Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Add a layer of sanity checking to cros_ec_register against attempting to
> register IRQ values that are not strictly greater than 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Enrico Granata <egranata@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
This strikes me as something that could be a potential fix to backport?
Any known cases of a negative irq getting to here or is this a by
inspection thing?
Otherwise seems obviously correct.
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
Jonathan
> ---
> No changes in v4, v3.
> Changes in v2:
> Remove dual Enrico's signature.
>
> drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec.c
> index 925f84dbf621..d3dfa27171e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec.c
> @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ int cros_ec_register(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev)
> return err;
> }
>
> - if (ec_dev->irq) {
> + if (ec_dev->irq > 0) {
> err = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, ec_dev->irq,
> ec_irq_handler,
> ec_irq_thread,
