Re: [PATCH] spi: AD accelerometer: declare missing of table

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 9:58 AM Alexandru Ardelean
<ardeleanalex@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 10:20 PM Daniel Gomez <dagmcr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Add missing <of_device_id> table for SPI driver relying on SPI
> > device match since compatible is in a DT binding or in a DTS.
> >
>
> Hey,
>
> The driver is under iio, so commit title should be something like:
>
> iio: accelerometer: adxl372: declare missing of table
> or
> iio: adxl372: declare missing of table
Okay! It makes sense so, I'll make the changes and send it back as v2.
I have sent other patches fixing the same issue under iio but with other
maintainers so, I will follow the same approach.
>
> > Before this patch:
> > modinfo drivers/iio/accel/adxl372_spi.ko | grep alias
> >
> > After this patch:
> > modinfo drivers/iio/accel/adxl372_spi.ko | grep alias
> > alias:          spi:adxl372
> > alias:          of:N*T*Cadi,adxl372C*
> > alias:          of:N*T*Cadi,adxl372
> >
> > Reported-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Gomez <dagmcr@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iio/accel/adxl372_spi.c | 9 +++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/adxl372_spi.c b/drivers/iio/accel/adxl372_spi.c
> > index e14e655..af0624b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/accel/adxl372_spi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/adxl372_spi.c
> > @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
> >
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/regmap.h>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> >  #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
> >
> >  #include "adxl372.h"
> > @@ -37,9 +39,16 @@ static const struct spi_device_id adxl372_spi_id[] = {
> >  };
> >  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, adxl372_spi_id);
> >
> > +static const struct of_device_id adxl372_spi_of_match[] = {
>
> The `spi` part of the name is un-needed.
> So,
> adxl372_spi_of_match  ->  adxl372_of_match
> or
> adxl372_spi_of_match  ->  adxl372_of_table
>
>
> > +        { .compatible = "adi,adxl372" },
> > +        { },
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, adxl372_spi_of_match);
> > +
> >  static struct spi_driver adxl372_spi_driver = {
> >         .driver = {
> >                 .name = "adxl372_spi",
> > +               .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(adxl372_spi_of_match),
>
> I think the the `of_match_ptr()` is un-needed. It messes with some ACPI stuff.
>
> So, something like:
>     .of_match_table = adxl372_of_table,
> should be fine.
Okay, I'll remove it as well but I thought this macro was needed to check if DT
support is enabled but only if the driver can be compiled as a module.
So, what's the reason for being unneeded in this case?
Thanks in advance!
>
> Rest looks good
>
> Thanks
> Alex
>
> >         },
> >         .probe = adxl372_spi_probe,
> >         .id_table = adxl372_spi_id,
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux