On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 12:47:40 +0100
Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> wrote:
> The example should follow the practice or using a generic node name
> instead of the precise programming model, as recommended by the DTSpec.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx>
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing
to be largely ignored.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/lis302.txt | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/lis302.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/lis302.txt
> index dfdce67826ba..764e28ec1a0a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/lis302.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/lis302.txt
> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ Optional properties for all bus drivers:
>
> Example for a SPI device node:
>
> - lis302@0 {
> + accelerometer@0 {
> compatible = "st,lis302dl-spi";
> reg = <0>;
> spi-max-frequency = <1000000>;
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ Example for a SPI device node:
>
> Example for a I2C device node:
>
> - lis331dlh: lis331dlh@18 {
> + lis331dlh: accelerometer@18 {
> compatible = "st,lis331dlh", "st,lis3lv02d";
> reg = <0x18>;
> Vdd-supply = <&lis3_reg>;
