On 11/19/18 12:45 AM, Daniel Baluta wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 2:54 AM Martin Kelly <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Martin Kelly <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Currently, we snap the timestamp after reading from the buffer and
processing the event. Technically, we can get a slightly more accurate
timestamp by snapping it prior to reading the data, since the data was
already generated prior to entering the trigger handler. This is not going
to make a huge difference, but we might as well improve slightly.
Signed-off-by: Martin Kelly <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Makes sense to me.
Acked-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@xxxxxxxxx>
Would be nice to see some datapoints and compare the differences.
I agree. I'm a bit short of time this week because of Thanksgiving, but
I'll try to do a bit of timing testing before and after the patch next week.
