On 22 September 2018 12:48:49 BST, Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 11:36:16AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 15:26:03 +0800 >> kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > Hi Eugen, >> This one is leaving me stumped... >> >> Anyone care to point out what I'm missing that is wrong here? >> >> Also Eugen, please don't cc stable on a patch directly. It is fine >to send >> a backport request once a patch has hit mainline, but before that >it's just >> adding noise to a list as they won't take it directly anyway. > >Song is correct on this one. > >So, just replace the declaration to: > > struct iio_chan_spec const *chan; > >and then warning goes away... Good point. Not enough coffee this morning.. Obvious now :) > >Another thing, its better not to reply the automated bot and instead to >the author by changing "From" address. :) > >That is what I do often when replying to that thread. > >https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180921182616.GA2077@himanshu-Vostro-3559/ > >And it nests properly in the given thread avoiding any noise to kbuild >bot. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
