On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 09:41:39AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 18:58:37 +0000 >Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> [This is an automated email] >> >> This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag. >> The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all >> >> The bot has tested the following trees: v4.18.8, v4.14.70, v4.9.127, v4.4.156, v3.18.122, >> >> v4.18.8: Build OK! >> v4.14.70: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: >> 22aac3eb0c46 ("MAINTAINERS: add entry for STM32 I2C driver") >> >> v4.9.127: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: >> 22aac3eb0c46 ("MAINTAINERS: add entry for STM32 I2C driver") >> 78f839029e1d ("iio: distance: srf08: add IIO driver for us ranger") >> >> v4.4.156: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: >> 22aac3eb0c46 ("MAINTAINERS: add entry for STM32 I2C driver") >> 78f839029e1d ("iio: distance: srf08: add IIO driver for us ranger") >> >> v3.18.122: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: >> 22aac3eb0c46 ("MAINTAINERS: add entry for STM32 I2C driver") >> 4193c0f1d863 ("iio: driver for Semtech SX9500 proximity solution") >> 78f839029e1d ("iio: distance: srf08: add IIO driver for us ranger") >> >> >> Please let us know how to resolve this. >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Sasha >Hi Sasha, > >This is a false detection. The stable tag is in the context of the >additions to MAINTAINERS. I guess that is a rare enough case it's not >worth fixing in your scripts, but thought I'd point it out incase you >want to do so! Hah, interesting! I'll get it fixed, thanks!