On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 15:58:30 +0200
Philipp Rossak <embed3d@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 02.09.2018 22:11, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > This feels like a good place to factor out the code into a utility
> > function that just does one of them. That should hopefully
> > reduce the indenting etc enough to make the code easier to read.
> >
> >> + info->tzds[i].info = info;
> >> + info->tzds[i].sensor_id = i;
> >> +
> >> + info->tzds[i].tzd = thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(
> >> + info->sensor_device,
> >> + i, &info->tzds[i], &sun4i_ts_tz_ops);
> >> + /*
> >> + * Do not fail driver probing when failing to register in
> >> + * thermal because no thermal DT node is found.
> >> + */
> >> + if (IS_ERR(info->tzds[i].tzd) && \
> >> + PTR_ERR(info->tzds[i].tzd) != -ENODEV) {
> >> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> >> + "could not register thermal sensor: %ld\n",
> >> + PTR_ERR(info->tzds[i].tzd));
> >> + return PTR_ERR(info->tzds[i].tzd);
> >> + }
>
> So this code above should be placed in a separate function and called by
> the for loop?
> Did I understand that right?
Yes - exactly.
>
> Philipp
