Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 20:53:51 +0200
Cc: Nikolaus Voss <nikolaus.voss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx>, Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@xxxxxx>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@xxxxxxxxxx>, Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi83@xxxxxxxxx>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>, Xiongfeng Wang <xiongfeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-iio <linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAHp75VeNAfKF6C1RuMJgHMLDSBFH7=X9YJSzsueM7soMYSKung@mail.gmail.com>
References: <cover.1530599660.git.nikolaus.voss@loewensteinmedical.de> <CAHp75VdkeVEuJtcGB4unoSJqRh2r+_7aGJ+BPKO2ABriVQigvQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1807041100360.7891@fox.voss.local> <CAHp75VdxtfkrV0bT=4yeYcSUFncTvjBfVC1haOUPpdOaOohmLg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1807041119360.8194@fox.voss.local> <CAHp75VcQrd134aA54_nZtGr3YaXAtwZLXpj6Oi1=BOSMynEvVQ@mail.gmail.com> <10258a21-db42-2c4e-91d6-e9227e11f53b@redhat.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1807041304490.9558@fox.voss.local> <CABxcv==_JaiX7-++MRFTHmaikWbNin_YbaWuiqiuZAAuWPgvwQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1807041332340.9872@fox.voss.local> <CABxcv=kL0eV9mygvX=LvqNobyyi0ySHAo1O3v2t7+q3mk_rZyA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1807041420160.9872@fox.voss.local> <CABxcv==xgZb5iyupLvFno=JNnxWnkyD8stFjACz_x756Lm2yRA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1807041501420.11004@fox.voss.local> <96736265-f7ef-fff7-eb28-6a9715024e00@redhat.com> <CAHp75VeNAfKF6C1RuMJgHMLDSBFH7=X9YJSzsueM7soMYSKung@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0

Hi Andy,

On 07/04/2018 06:11 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 4:44 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
> <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 07/04/2018 03:24 PM, Nikolaus Voss wrote:
> 
>>> I hope you're still not annoyed...
>> Don't worry for that, it's very hard to get my annoyed :)
> 
> Javier, thanks for your patience and nice explanation!
> 

You are welcome. I'm glad you found it useful!

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Software Engineer - Desktop Hardware Enablement
Red Hat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

References:
- [PATCH v2 0/2] IIO: st_sensors_i2c: improve device enumeration
  - From: Nikolaus Voss
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
  - From: Andy Shevchenko
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
  - From: Nikolaus Voss
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
  - From: Andy Shevchenko
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
  - From: Nikolaus Voss
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
  - From: Andy Shevchenko
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
  - From: Javier Martinez Canillas
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
  - From: Nikolaus Voss
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
  - From: Javier Martinez Canillas
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
  - From: Nikolaus Voss
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
  - From: Javier Martinez Canillas
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
  - From: Nikolaus Voss
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
  - From: Javier Martinez Canillas
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
  - From: Nikolaus Voss
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
  - From: Javier Martinez Canillas
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
  - From: Andy Shevchenko

Prev by Date: Re: [v7,03/10] docs: Add Generic Counter interface documentation
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] iio: accel: adxl345: add sampling frequency support
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
Next by thread: [PATCH v3 0/3] iio: hx711: add data-ready-delay
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Input] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [X.org]