Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 19:11:54 +0300
Cc: Nikolaus Voss <nikolaus.voss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx>, Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@xxxxxx>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@xxxxxxxxxx>, Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi83@xxxxxxxxx>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>, Xiongfeng Wang <xiongfeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-iio <linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <96736265-f7ef-fff7-eb28-6a9715024e00@redhat.com>
References: <cover.1530599660.git.nikolaus.voss@loewensteinmedical.de> <CAHp75Vd5f7Xj51ZKoxOWibrx4Bkh-HxkMwjKmEeumZm=WV2ksQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1807040728490.6169@fox.voss.local> <CAHp75VdkeVEuJtcGB4unoSJqRh2r+_7aGJ+BPKO2ABriVQigvQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1807041100360.7891@fox.voss.local> <CAHp75VdxtfkrV0bT=4yeYcSUFncTvjBfVC1haOUPpdOaOohmLg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1807041119360.8194@fox.voss.local> <CAHp75VcQrd134aA54_nZtGr3YaXAtwZLXpj6Oi1=BOSMynEvVQ@mail.gmail.com> <10258a21-db42-2c4e-91d6-e9227e11f53b@redhat.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1807041304490.9558@fox.voss.local> <CABxcv==_JaiX7-++MRFTHmaikWbNin_YbaWuiqiuZAAuWPgvwQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1807041332340.9872@fox.voss.local> <CABxcv=kL0eV9mygvX=LvqNobyyi0ySHAo1O3v2t7+q3mk_rZyA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1807041420160.9872@fox.voss.local> <CABxcv==xgZb5iyupLvFno=JNnxWnkyD8stFjACz_x756Lm2yRA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1807041501420.11004@fox.voss.local> <96736265-f7ef-fff7-eb28-6a9715024e00@redhat.com>

On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 4:44 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
<javierm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 07/04/2018 03:24 PM, Nikolaus Voss wrote:

>> I hope you're still not annoyed...
> Don't worry for that, it's very hard to get my annoyed :)

Javier, thanks for your patience and nice explanation!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
  - From: Javier Martinez Canillas

References:
- [PATCH v2 0/2] IIO: st_sensors_i2c: improve device enumeration
  - From: Nikolaus Voss
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
  - From: Andy Shevchenko
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
  - From: Nikolaus Voss
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
  - From: Andy Shevchenko
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
  - From: Nikolaus Voss
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
  - From: Andy Shevchenko
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
  - From: Nikolaus Voss
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
  - From: Andy Shevchenko
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
  - From: Javier Martinez Canillas
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
  - From: Nikolaus Voss
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
  - From: Javier Martinez Canillas
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
  - From: Nikolaus Voss
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
  - From: Javier Martinez Canillas
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
  - From: Nikolaus Voss
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
  - From: Javier Martinez Canillas
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
  - From: Nikolaus Voss
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
  - From: Javier Martinez Canillas

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Simplify access to driver data
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Input] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [X.org]