On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 13:22:22 +0100
David Julian Veenstra <davidjulianveenstra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 23, March 2018 14:17, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 14:35:46 +0100
> > David Veenstra <davidjulianveenstra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Add variable to hold &spi->dev in ad2s1200_probe. This value is repeatedly
> >> used in ad2s1200_probe.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: David Veenstra <davidjulianveenstra@xxxxxxxxx>
> > I'm a little unconvinced by this one. It adds code to save
> > a really very trivial bit of repetition. If it had been
> > via another pointer or this would have made a big difference
> > in number of lines by bringing a lot of entries below 80 chars
> > that weren't previous, then there would be a good argument.
> >
> > Here, not so much.
>
> The 9th patch adds another 4 occurrences. So in total &st->dev appears
> 9 times in ad2s1200_probe. To me it seemed worth it to
> introduce a variable for it. But I agree that it doesn't add much.
>
> Best regards,
> David Veenstra
>
OK, up to you then, I don't care enough to resist the change.
Jonathan
> >
> > Jonathan
> >> ---
> >> drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s1200.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s1200.c b/drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s1200.c
> >> index 00efba598671..eceb86e952de 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s1200.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s1200.c
> >> @@ -118,19 +118,22 @@ static int ad2s1200_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> >> unsigned short *pins = spi->dev.platform_data;
> >> struct ad2s1200_state *st;
> >> struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> >> + struct device *dev;
> >> int pn, ret = 0;
> >>
> >> + dev = &spi->dev;
> >> +
> >> for (pn = 0; pn < AD2S1200_PN; pn++) {
> >> - ret = devm_gpio_request_one(&spi->dev, pins[pn], GPIOF_DIR_OUT,
> >> + ret = devm_gpio_request_one(dev, pins[pn], GPIOF_DIR_OUT,
> >> DRV_NAME);
> >> if (ret) {
> >> - dev_err(&spi->dev, "request gpio pin %d failed\n",
> >> + dev_err(dev, "request gpio pin %d failed\n",
> >> pins[pn]);
> >> return ret;
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> - indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(&spi->dev, sizeof(*st));
> >> + indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(dev, sizeof(*st));
> >> if (!indio_dev)
> >> return -ENOMEM;
> >>
> >> @@ -141,14 +144,14 @@ static int ad2s1200_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> >> st->sample = pins[0];
> >> st->rdvel = pins[1];
> >>
> >> - indio_dev->dev.parent = &spi->dev;
> >> + indio_dev->dev.parent = dev;
> >> indio_dev->info = &ad2s1200_info;
> >> indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
> >> indio_dev->channels = ad2s1200_channels;
> >> indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(ad2s1200_channels);
> >> indio_dev->name = spi_get_device_id(spi)->name;
> >>
> >> - ret = devm_iio_device_register(&spi->dev, indio_dev);
> >> + ret = devm_iio_device_register(dev, indio_dev);
> >> if (ret)
> >> return ret;
> >>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
