If rising: use transient OR ff_mt device-dependent like before. But
now save it in a simple flag,
whether transient registers are available.
Ok, is it good idea to add the flag to struct mma_chip_info like below?
* @mma_scales: scale factors for converting
register values
* to m/s^2; 3 modes: 2g, 4g, 8g; 2 integers
* per mode: m/s^2 and micro m/s^2
+ * @transient_supported: flag indicating whether chip support
transient
+ * event, as not all chips support
transient event
*/
struct mma_chip_info {
u8 chip_id;
const struct iio_chan_spec *channels;
int num_channels;
const int mma_scales[3][2];
+ bool transient_supported;
};
If falling: switch to ff_mt in any case. (fixing freefall for the
transient-devices)
ok sure.
Thanks,
Hari
On 08/21/2017 04:47 AM, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
If rising: use transient OR ff_mt device-dependent like before. But
now save it in a simple flag,
whether transient registers are available.
If falling: switch to ff_mt in any case. (fixing freefall for the
transient-devices)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
