On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 09:42:01 +0200 Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08/20/2017 05:13 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > If anyone has time to look over this set that would be great. > > > > The ancient problem for maintainers, who is the reviewer of last > > resort? Oh me... That doesn't work for my patches :) > > > > No actual rush though - don't mind if these sit until next cycle - > > would just get irritating if they sit until the one after and I have > > to rebase them again... > > Sorry, for the delay. Whole series > > Reviewed-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> > > (I didn't actually review each of the individual '-.driver_module = > THIS_MODULE', but I assume coccinelle did the right thing based on the > spatch script). I did a couple of the new ones by hand but they look the same so should be fine! Thanks for review. I'll drop the coccinelle patch I think as the field will have gone away so it won't be possible to set it wrong in future. Jonathan > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
