On 8.8.2017 17:52, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-08-08 at 14:04 +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>> From: Sai Krishna Potthuri <lakshmi.sai.krishna.potthuri@xxxxxxxxxx>
> []
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc.h b/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc.h
> []
>> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ struct xadc_ops {
>> int (*setup)(struct platform_device *pdev, struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> int irq);
>> void (*update_alarm)(struct xadc *, unsigned int);
>> - unsigned long (*get_dclk_rate)(struct xadc *);
>> + unsigned long (*get_dclk_rate)(struct xadc *xadc);
>> irqreturn_t (*interrupt_handler)(int, void *);
>
> Doesn't it seem odd to you that the lines above and below
> have the same form?
>
> checkpatch is an imperfect tool.
> It will always be imperfect.
> Please use your eyes and mind too.
You are right. I have missed that in internal review. Fixed in v2.
Thanks,
Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
