On 11/11/16 11:37, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2016-11-09 16:06, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> On Wed, 9 Nov 2016, Peter Rosin wrote: >>> On 2016-11-08 22:47, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >>>> I don't think you need extra race handling with that, but I might be wrong >>>> as usual. >>> >>> There's obviously no way to determine which of the timeout or the >>> interrupt that happens first without some race handling, so I don't >>> know what you mean? If the timeout happens first, there is also a >>> need to handle late hits from the irq that might come in during the >>> preparation for the next step in the binary search. It gets messy >>> quickly compared to the simplicity of the current implementation. >> >> Gah, forgot about that timeout thingy. Fair enough. >> >> Feel free to add an >> >> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks for looking! Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing for the autobuilders to play with. Excellent patch set. Thanks, Jonathan > > Cheers, > Peter > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
