On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08/03/2016 10:02 PM, Matt Ranostay wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 5:13 AM, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 08/02/2016 06:25 AM, Matt Ranostay wrote: >>>> DT match name should be similar to the i2c device table entry. >>> >>> Why? >> >> To be consistent mostly. But I have noticed compatible = >> "ams,iaq-core" doesn't actually match... > > Well, consistent with what? The normal pattern for devicetree compatible > strings is vendor,partname. So that would suggest that ams,iaq-core is the > preferred solution if it is supposed to be consistent. Btw. there seem to be > no binding documents for this part. > >> Does anyone here know if i2c-core just checks the id_table, and not >> of_match_table as well? >> >> Anyone have thoughts on this but I dig into this too deep? > > It uses of_match_table when it is set. See > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c#n609 Yeah thought would enumerate it as well.. but could be that someone broke something in i2c controller or core. Will test again :) > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
