On 08/03/2016 10:02 PM, Matt Ranostay wrote: > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 5:13 AM, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 08/02/2016 06:25 AM, Matt Ranostay wrote: >>> DT match name should be similar to the i2c device table entry. >> >> Why? > > To be consistent mostly. But I have noticed compatible = > "ams,iaq-core" doesn't actually match... Well, consistent with what? The normal pattern for devicetree compatible strings is vendor,partname. So that would suggest that ams,iaq-core is the preferred solution if it is supposed to be consistent. Btw. there seem to be no binding documents for this part. > Does anyone here know if i2c-core just checks the id_table, and not > of_match_table as well? > > Anyone have thoughts on this but I dig into this too deep? It uses of_match_table when it is set. See http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c#n609 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
