On 01.05.2016 20:02, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On 29/04/16 18:45, Harald Geyer wrote:
My thinking is that there should be a thermistor (or whatever else)
driver,
that is a consumer of the regulator and a consumer of the
IIO_VOLTAGE
iio channel and provides a new device with an IIO_RESISTANCE or
IIO_TEMP
channel. Maybe there is a simpler solution, that I'm missing?
I agree with that approach - need a way to describe the upstream
hardware - so
will need a thermistor driver
Actually I'm not 100% happy with the above solution myself, because
if we
start supporting devices that act as an iio-multiplexer (some device
that
is an iio consumer and provides many new iio channels and can
control
via gpios which of it child channels is actually routed to the
upstream
device) I don't know how to properly manage the regulator device.
Hmm. Are you talking about muxing the regulator as well? That will
get
complex indeed. Might be possible to cheat and imply the regulators
are
always connected to all inputs... or do you want to dynamically
change
the regulator output? That gets messy fast - though in theory might
be
possible...
Yes, that's a good summary of what I'm thinking. As there is no
iio-multiplexer yet, this is sort of an academic question. But it's
kind of an obvious thing to want, so we shouldn't be surprised when
somebody actually starts working on that.
Thanks,
Harald
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
