Re: Correctness of acpi-als channel mask

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday, December 19, 2015 at 05:09:33 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 17/12/15 20:32, Gabriele Mazzotta wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I have a question regarding the acpi-als driver.
> > 
> > Currently acpi-als uses IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW to report the data coming
> > from the sensor. However, as per the ACPI specification [1] (section
> > 9.2.2), these values represent the ambient light illuminance expressed
> > in lux. Wouldn't IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED be more appropriate in this
> > case as the data are in theory pre-processed by the firmware of the
> > platform?
> 
> Looks like it to me as well.  Cc'd Marek and Martin.

Gotta say, I haven't looked at ACPI for a while now. My impression is that these 
data are RAW and the system software can adjust them based on the values in _ALR
table. The result of that would be _PROCESSED I think. But I might be entirely 
wrong.

> > [1] http://www.acpi.info/DOWNLOADS/ACPIspec50.pdf
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Gabriele
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Best regards,
Marek Vasut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux