Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] iio: ltr501: Add interrupt rate control support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/10/2015 07:51 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
[...]
So level rather than edge triggered.  Definitely what we put _period
in for in the first place.  Admittedly persistence might have been a
better
name, but too late now! (dratted ABI compatibility)

J
But we cannot use period for this use case. According to _period ABI
description,
It specifies the period of time for which the condition must be true
for
getting a
valid event. But here, we are checking for number of times a condition
must be
true for generating a valid event.
But we are checking that condition at a known sampling rate I assume?
Hence
period = persistence x 1/sampling frequency?

Sorry for highjacking this thread.

So period is for the time interval it has the event has to be asserted before it is registered. What would we call the same thing but for the de-assertion of the event? The event has to be de-asserted for X amount of time before it gets propagated.

Thanks,
- Lars

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux