On 04/01/2015 04:04 PM, Daniel Baluta wrote: [...]
+static const struct iio_chan_spec_ext_info ltr501_ext_info[] = { + { + .name = "intr_persist", + .read = ltr501_read_intr_prst, + .write = ltr501_write_intr_prst, + .shared = IIO_SHARED_BY_TYPE, + }, + {}, +}; +Would be nice to standardize persistence attribute (IIO_CHAN_INFO_PERSISTENCE).
If I understand the behavior correctly it causes that the event needs to be triggered at least n times before the event is reported by the chip. In my opinion 'persistence' is not a good term for that. I'm not sure what a better term is but I think it should go more in the direction of ratelimit or something.
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
