On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Nov 2014, Vignesh R wrote:
>
> > In one shot mode, sequencer automatically disables all enabled steps at
> > the end of each cycle. (both ADC steps and TSC steps) Hence these steps
> > need not be saved in reg_se_cache for clearing these steps at a later
> > stage.
> > Also, when ADC wakes up Sequencer should not be busy executing any of the
> > config steps except for the charge step. Previously charge step was 1 ADC
> > clock cycle and hence it was ignored.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vignesh R <vigneshr@xxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c | 7 +++++--
> > include/linux/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c b/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c
> > index d877e777cce6..94ef8992f46b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c
> > @@ -86,8 +86,12 @@ static void am335x_tscadc_need_adc(struct ti_tscadc_dev *tsadc)
> > spin_lock_irq(&tsadc->reg_lock);
> > finish_wait(&tsadc->reg_se_wait, &wait);
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Sequencer should either be idle or
> > + * busy applying the charge step.
> > + */
> > reg = tscadc_readl(tsadc, REG_ADCFSM);
> > - WARN_ON(reg & SEQ_STATUS);
> > + WARN_ON(reg & SEQ_STATUS & (!CHARGE_STEP));
>
> This is almost certainly not correct.
>
> Please take another look at the logic.
>
> I'm _assuming_ you mean (reg & SEQ_STATUS && !CHARGE_STEP).
So I just saw that CHARGE_STEP is actually the new macro below.
So you're currently ANDing these together.
xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx reg
00000000 00000000 00000000 00100000 #define SEQ_STATUS BIT(5)
00000000 00000000 00000000 00010001 #define CHARGE_STEP 0x11
... which will always equate to 0.
> > tsadc->adc_waiting = false;
> > }
> > tsadc->adc_in_use = true;
> > @@ -96,7 +100,6 @@ static void am335x_tscadc_need_adc(struct ti_tscadc_dev *tsadc)
> > void am335x_tsc_se_set_once(struct ti_tscadc_dev *tsadc, u32 val)
> > {
> > spin_lock_irq(&tsadc->reg_lock);
> > - tsadc->reg_se_cache |= val;
Didn't you add this line a little over 1 month ago?
Why the change of heart?
> > am335x_tscadc_need_adc(tsadc);
> >
> > tscadc_writel(tsadc, REG_SE, val);
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.h b/include/linux/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.h
> > index c99be5dc0f5c..fcce182e4a35 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.h
> > @@ -128,6 +128,7 @@
> >
> > /* Sequencer Status */
> > #define SEQ_STATUS BIT(5)
> > +#define CHARGE_STEP 0x11
> >
> > #define ADC_CLK 3000000
> > #define TOTAL_STEPS 16
>
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
