On Tue, 2014-09-09 at 21:53 +0300, Daniel Baluta wrote: > Hi Bastien, > > On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Bastien Nocera <hadess@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The Onda v975w tablet contains an accelerometer that's advertised over > > ACPI as SMO8500. This device is however a KXCJ9 accelerometer as > > can be seen in the Windows driver's INF file. > > > > > --- > > > > I tested the patch, and it works correctly in my testing. However, > > there's no GPIO pin for the "data ready" interrupt, and this throws an > > error that looks fatal in the logs (could this be downgraded?), and > > the name of the device doesn't match the hid-sensor-hub ones, making it > > hard for user-space to discover them. > > (https://github.com/hadess/iio-sensor-proxy is my attempt at something > > that integrates with user-space and the IIO sensors) > > > > How does your ACPI .dsl file looks like? > > > It will also conflict with Daniel's patch here: > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-iio/msg14438.html > > It shouldn't. The patch is already in togreg branch of Jonathan's tree > [1]. Anyhow, > it will conflict with this one [2]. Do you want me to rebase the patch on a particular tree? Do you need any particular changes done in my commit message or patch to get this merged? Cheers -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
