Hello Arnd,
On 18 July 2014 15:12, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Friday 18 July 2014 14:59:43 Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> This patchset add 'exynos_adc_data' structure which includes some functions
>> to control ADC operation and specific data according to ADC version (v1 or v2).
>>
>
> This new structure makes a lot of sense for covering the exynos specific
> versions, but it will likely give a little more complexity for the
> older models. We'll have to deal with that later then, no need to
> hold up your patch. Interestingly, the version numbers seem weird. The
> old driver uses
>
> {
> .name = "s3c24xx-adc",
> .driver_data = TYPE_ADCV1,
> }, {
> .name = "s3c2443-adc",
> .driver_data = TYPE_ADCV11,
> }, {
> .name = "s3c2416-adc",
> .driver_data = TYPE_ADCV12,
> }, {
> .name = "s3c64xx-adc",
> .driver_data = TYPE_ADCV2,
> }, {
> .name = "samsung-adc-v3",
> .driver_data = TYPE_ADCV3,
> }
>
> Where TYPE_ADCV3 seems to be the same as the new ADC_V1 used in this
> driver. Do you have an explanation for that?
As per suggestion from Doug Anderson,
I've implemented IIO based ADC driver to work with Exynos5250.
keeping the plat-samsung/adc.c unchanged.
Assuming Exynos5250 is the one using the driver for the first time.
i've named it v1 and so on.
Now, This seems to cause a lot of confusion.
>
> Arnd
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Shine bright,
(: Nav :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
