Re: [next:master 1495/1772] drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c:86:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>On 09/24/2013 05:28 AM, kbuild test robot wrote:
>>> tree:  
>>git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
>>master
>>> head:   1fa8f71dfa6e28c89afad7ac71dcb19b8c8da8b7
>>> commit: 09a799d04eb17e19bbc80cb0e350a3ec89552b01 [1495/1772]
>>staging:iio:dummy: Use iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp()
>>> config: i386-randconfig-j6-09240827 (attached as .config)
>>>
>>> All error/warnings:
>>>
>>>     drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c: In function
>>'iio_simple_dummy_trigger_h':
>>>>> drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c:86:2: error:
>implicit
>>declaration of function 'iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp'
>>[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>>       iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(indio_dev, data,
>>iio_get_time_ns());
>>>       ^
>>>     drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c: At top level:
>>>     drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c:108:16: error:
>>'iio_sw_buffer_preenable' undeclared here (not in a function)
>>>       .preenable = &iio_sw_buffer_preenable,
>>>                     ^
>>>     drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c: In function
>>'iio_simple_dummy_configure_buffer':
>>>     drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c:141:8: error:
>>dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
>>>       buffer->scan_timestamp = true;
>>>             ^
>>>     cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>>>
>>> vim +/iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp +86
>>drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c
>>>
>>>      80				/* random access read from the 'device' */
>>>      81				data[i] = fakedata[j];
>>>      82				len += 2;
>>>      83			}
>>>      84		}
>>>      85	
>>>    > 86		iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(indio_dev, data,
>>iio_get_time_ns());
>>>      87	
>>>      88		kfree(data);
>>>      89	
>>
>>
>>Hm, the config that generated this has:
>>
>>CONFIG_IIO=m
>># CONFIG_IIO_BUFFER is not set
>>CONFIG_IIO_KFIFO_BUF=m
>>
>>How is it possible that IIO_KFIFO_BUF is selected but not IIO_BUFFER?
>>
>How does a SELECT interact with an IF in kconfig?  I am not sure..
>
>We select the kfifo_buf and that is under IF IIO_BUFFER.

The documentation for select makes it clear that it does not enforce dependencies so I guess any select of Kfifo_buf must also select iio_buffer?  Sometimes there seems to be no right way of doing this stuff...

Oh for a dependency solver.
>
>
>>- Lars

-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux