Re: [next:master 1495/1772] drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c:86:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On 09/24/2013 05:28 AM, kbuild test robot wrote:
>> tree:  
>git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
>master
>> head:   1fa8f71dfa6e28c89afad7ac71dcb19b8c8da8b7
>> commit: 09a799d04eb17e19bbc80cb0e350a3ec89552b01 [1495/1772]
>staging:iio:dummy: Use iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp()
>> config: i386-randconfig-j6-09240827 (attached as .config)
>>
>> All error/warnings:
>>
>>     drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c: In function
>'iio_simple_dummy_trigger_h':
>>>> drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c:86:2: error: implicit
>declaration of function 'iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp'
>[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>       iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(indio_dev, data,
>iio_get_time_ns());
>>       ^
>>     drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c: At top level:
>>     drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c:108:16: error:
>'iio_sw_buffer_preenable' undeclared here (not in a function)
>>       .preenable = &iio_sw_buffer_preenable,
>>                     ^
>>     drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c: In function
>'iio_simple_dummy_configure_buffer':
>>     drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c:141:8: error:
>dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
>>       buffer->scan_timestamp = true;
>>             ^
>>     cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>>
>> vim +/iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp +86
>drivers/staging/iio/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c
>>
>>      80				/* random access read from the 'device' */
>>      81				data[i] = fakedata[j];
>>      82				len += 2;
>>      83			}
>>      84		}
>>      85	
>>    > 86		iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(indio_dev, data,
>iio_get_time_ns());
>>      87	
>>      88		kfree(data);
>>      89	
>
>
>Hm, the config that generated this has:
>
>CONFIG_IIO=m
># CONFIG_IIO_BUFFER is not set
>CONFIG_IIO_KFIFO_BUF=m
>
>How is it possible that IIO_KFIFO_BUF is selected but not IIO_BUFFER?
>
How does a SELECT interact with an IF in kconfig?  I am not sure..

We select the kfifo_buf and that is under IF IIO_BUFFER.


>- Lars



-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux