Hi, Jonathan and Greg
On 9/1/2013 2:09 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On 08/29/13 22:32, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:22:33PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
The following changes since commit d8dfad3876e4386666b759da3c833d62fb8b2267:
Linux 3.11-rc7 (2013-08-25 17:43:22 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git tags/iio-fixes-for-3.11d
for you to fetch changes up to 947b8ec78610fdfd891da249629f79cfa8e5da57:
iio: at91: fix adc_clk overflow (2013-08-29 21:42:11 +0100)
----------------------------------------------------------------
4th round of fixes for IIO in the 3.11 series.
Another one patch pull request, this one for an overflow issue that
can occur in the at91 adc driver.
How "necessary" is this for 3.11?
Is it something that a user can hit today?
The overflow only happened when user use a very high adc clock with a
big start-up time.
And our default start-up time in DTS is a low value (40ns). So I think
it is rare case.
Is it a regression from 3.10?
No.
Is it for a new driver?
No.
No
It's really late in the 3.11 cycle for me to want to send anything to
Linus except for "this fixes a major issue" type patches. Can we just
tag this for stable and have it show up in 3.11 after 3.12-rc1 is out?
Fine by me - have cc'd Josh and Maxime as they should be able to answer
the above better than me.
So I am fine with this.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Best Regards,
Josh Wu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
